This page collects benchmark results which are used in development. We would like to know whether IPFire got faster or slower with certain changes and therefore we collect this data to test IPFire against it whenever significant changes have found their way into the distribution. This will allow the development team to stay on the correct course and avoid introducing any performance regressions.
These benchmarks have been conducted with IPFire Appliances from Lightning Wire Labs to which the IPFire development team has easy access and which allow us to reproduce the benchmarks regularly.
The setup is as follows:
-D
)-P 10
)The fireperf command line looks as follows: fireperf -c 192.168.1.1 -D -P10
Appliance | ||
---|---|---|
IPFire 2.27 - Core Update 159 - Default Configuration | ||
IPFire Business Appliance | CPU Load | 1x 100% |
Throughput | 930 Mbit/s TX/RX (+10) | |
IPFire Mini Appliance | CPU Load | 1x 95%, 2x 75%, 1x 15% |
Throughput | 920 Mbit/s TX/RX (=) | |
IPFire 2.27 - Core Update 159 - IPS Enabled | ||
IPFire Business Appliance | CPU Load | 8x 75% |
Throughput | 920 Mbit/s TX/RX (+170) | |
IPFire Mini Appliance | CPU Load | 4x 100% |
Throughput | 170/140 Mbit/s TX/RX (+118/+15) | |
IPFire 2.25 - Core Update 158 - Default Configuration | ||
IPFire Business Appliance | CPU Load | 1x 70%, 1x 35%, 6x 15% |
Throughput | 920 Mbit/s TX/RX | |
IPFire Mini Appliance | CPU Load | 1x 100%, 3x idle |
Throughput | 520 Mbit/s TX/RX | |
IPFire 2.25 - Core Update 158 - IPS Enabled | ||
IPFire Business Appliance | CPU Load | 8x 100% |
Throughput | 750 Mbit/s TX/RX | |
IPFire Mini Appliance | CPU Load | 4x 100% |
Throughput | 52/125 Mbit/s TX/RX |
Values in brackets show the change to the previous benchmark of the same category.
Older Revisions • May 28 at 12:31 pm • iptom